Log in


INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE OF CHICAGO

  • 12 Nov 2024 5:03 PM | Deborah Hodges (Administrator)

    At least 87 people drowned in the Great Lakes this year, and more than half of the deaths happened in Lake Michigan, according to the Great Lakes Surf Rescue Project. [Chicago Tribune]

    “Drowning is way up there in fatality rates … but it doesn’t get treated like a public health issue — which it is,” said Dave Benjamin, co-founder and executive director of the water safety group, which has tracked drownings in the region for more than 10 years. “It’s one of the leading causes of unintentional injury-related death in the nation, in the world. And that’s with a very poor drowning statistic database, so the problem is exponentially worse than anybody even knows.”

    More than 1,300 people have drowned in the Great Lakes since the surf rescue project started collecting data in 2010. The highest number of drownings occurred in 2018 when 117 deaths were recorded.

    This year, at least 50 people have drowned in Lake Michigan. Since 2010, the group’s annual data indicates about half of all yearly drownings in Lake Michigan have happened on its south end — including Illinois’ lakefront — which is considered particularly dangerous because winds from the north and northeast create large waves and strong currents. The densely populated shores of Lake Michigan’s cities, like Chicago and Milwaukee, as well as the popular tourist destinations at its numerous sandy beaches also contribute to higher drowning risks.

    More> 

    Join us at the 2024 Leadership Summit on Dec. 4th, 2024

    Five thought leaders> five presentations all in one event.

    More details and to register here>

    ###

  • 8 Nov 2024 2:12 PM | Deborah Hodges (Administrator)

    Opioid and other drug overdose deaths are on the decline for the first time in decades, though rates vary widely by state, according to an analysis from KFF. [Beckers Health]

    Nationwide, opioid overdose deaths declined by 10% in the second half of 2023 compared to the second half of 2022. Provisional data from the CDC shows this trend continuing into 2024. 

    Year-over-year, opioid overdose deaths declined in three-quarters of states, with North Carolina recording a 41% decline from the second half of 2022 to 2023. 

    In a few states, opioid death rates increased. In Alaska, the number of opioid overdose deaths increased by 58% year-over-year. 

    Here are the states with the largest declines and increases in opioid-related deaths in the second half of 2023: 

    Largest declines: 

    • North Carolina: -41% 
    • Kansas: -30% 
    • Maine: -29% 
    • Indiana: -23% 
    • Pennsylvania: -20% 
    • Ohio: - 20% 
    • Louisiana: -20% 
    • Connecticut: -19% 
    • Arkansas: -19% 
    • Missouri: -17% 

    Largest increases: 

    • Alaska: 58% 
    • Oregon: 36% 
    • Nevada: 35% 
    • Washington: 22% 
    • Iowa: 17% 
    • Utah: 12% 
    • Montana: 9% 
    • Colorado: 7% 
    • Rhode Island: 7% 
    • Alaska: 1% 

    More>

    ###

  • 7 Nov 2024 9:30 AM | Deborah Hodges (Administrator)

    The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is proud of the work done by the Task Force on Maternal Mental Health, building on the White House Blueprint on Maternal Mental Health - PDF and the White House Initiative on Women’s Health Research,  to develop and deliver recommendations to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s Advisory Committee for Women’s Services to improve maternal mental health in the U.S. [ US Dept. of Health and Human Services] 

    Following the one-year anniversary of the Task Force on Maternal Mental Health launch, HHS is expanding efforts to advance maternal mental health and substance use disorder care. HHS is asking interested non-federal organizations to submit a pledge(s) - PDF  highlighting new initiative(s) that address challenges and barriers to maternal mental health and substance use disorder care.

    HHS will collect pledges through December 6, 2024, and announce them publicly in early 2025. Questions? Send to TFMMH@hhs.gov.

    More> 

    ###

  • 6 Nov 2024 6:37 PM | Deborah Hodges (Administrator)

    Efforts to address cancer care in Chicago must also take into account longstanding racial disparities that lead to delayed care and deaths, advocates said during a recent City Club of Chicago Event. [Health News Illinois]

    Marie Lynn Miranda, chancellor at the University of Illinois Chicago, said that disparities are the “first, middle and last thing” they do when working on cancer care. She said their data shows that Black and Brown residents often do not receive the preemptive care, such as health screenings, like their white counterparts. 

    “We implemented a program to do outreach through all kinds of community-based organizations to increase screening rates for breast cancer, and we stuck with it,” Miranda said. “It was a sustained effort, and through that effort there was a 20 percent decrease in the stage of diagnosis of breast cancer among women of color.”

    Tawa Mitchell, a member of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society’s Board of Trustees, said Black and Brown residents often aren’t able to access the latest therapies or treatments that could help them, in part because of disparity in insurance coverage.

    “If a pill costs $400 to take to treat your cancer and it’s proven effective, but you can't afford it, then what good is that medication?” Mitchell asked.

    She said their organization is working with state lawmakers to ensure there is parity in treatment coverage.

    Dr. Edwin McDonald an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Chicago Medicine, said it’s one thing to acknowledge the social determinants of health, but it’s important to take the next step and understand why they exist and how to address them.

    Another challenge, he said, is the healthcare field has not done a good job of explaining what cancer is and its possible causes, which leads to confusion among patients.

    “A lot of times, people that became at risk were living a life that was putting them at risk for disease, and they had no idea,” McDonald said.

    Dr. Olusimbo Ige, commissioner of the city’s Department of Public Health, said conversations like the one held by the City Club of Chicago bring awareness to the issue, which is one major step to addressing it.

    ###


  • 5 Nov 2024 5:25 PM | Deborah Hodges (Administrator)

    To address the maternal health crisis in the U.S., CMS has issued new conditions of participation standards for hospitals that offer obstetrical services as part of its 2025 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System rule shared Nov. 1.  [Becker's Clinical Leadership]

    The new requirements will ensure all Medicare- and Medicaid-participating hospitals offering obstetric services are "held to a consistent standard of high-quality maternity care that protects the health and safety of pregnant, birthing and postpartum patients," according to a Nov. 1 CMS fact sheet.

    Here are eight things to know about the new standards:

    1. Hospitals must meet the maternal health conditions to avoid termination from Medicare and Medicaid.

    2. CMS is finalizing a phased implementation plan for the new requirements to address potential burdens raised during public feedback. The planned implementation will start in 2026 and occur in three phases over two years.

    More> 

    ###

  • 4 Nov 2024 4:24 PM | Deborah Hodges (Administrator)

    In the final days of the campaign, stark disagreements between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump over the future of American health care are on display — in particular, in sober warnings about abortion access, the specter of future cuts to the Affordable Care Act, and bold pronouncements about empowering activists eager to change course and clean house. {KFF Health News] 

    Trump and his campaign have been vague about plans on health care policies, though current and former Trump aides have published blueprints that go well beyond reversing programs in force under the Biden administration, to overhauling public health agencies and enabling Trump to quickly fire officials who disagree.

    Harris, on the other hand, has staked out positions primarily preserving and protecting existing health care access — on abortion, transgender health care, insurance coverage, and more.

    Here are some of the most consequential changes in health policies that could hinge on who wins the White House.

    More> 

    ###


  • 1 Nov 2024 3:18 PM | Deborah Hodges (Administrator)

    A committee led by Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., held a meeting this week in Chicago to discuss efforts to reduce prescription drug prices. [Health News Illinois]

    They focused on the role of pharmacy benefit managers in the prescription drug pipeline, a discussion that echoed hearings Illinois lawmakers have been having this year.

    Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul called for more transparency on PBM pricing and business practices. While discussions are ongoing in Springfield, he told the committee that Congress must lead on the issue.

    “The question that we're faced with with state actions to regulate PBMs is whether we're preempted by the feds, and that's why we've been trying to use both efforts to encourage and protect state efforts to to control the pricing, as well as to encourage Congress to be able to get some transparency and get these PBMs to furnish their pricing data to that as well as state payers,” Raoul said.

    Raoul this summer requested the U.S. Supreme Court review how much authority states have to regulate the industry. In response, the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, a trade group for PBMs, said that requiring plan sponsors to include “unsafe or inefficient pharmacies in their provider networks, and forbidding health plans from using common cost-containment tools like preferred networks, will increase prescription drug costs for plans and patients.”

    PBM leaders have told state lawmakers that they are not opposed to more transparency, but stressed that if some information is made public regarding negotiations with drug manufacturers or pharmacies, it could affect their ability to achieve lower prices.

    The committee also discussed the role of advertisements to direct consumers to request certain medications from their doctors, regardless of whether it is necessary or if there’s a cheaper generic.

    Dr. Anthony Douglas II, a general surgery resident at the University of Chicago, said it’s common for patients to request a drug like Ozempic, only to find out they cannot afford the list price.

    “Not only do they advertise directly to physicians to encourage us to prescribe these medications, but they also encourage patients to go in the clinics, in the hospitals, to ask for these medications,” Douglas said.

    Durbin has long advocated for legislation to require drug manufacturers to provide price disclosures on advertisements for prescription drugs. Manufacturers have opposed the previous efforts, saying they could confuse patients and may discourage some from seeking needed care.

    Durbin proposed another plan in September that would task the Food and Drug Administration to address false and misleading prescription drug promotions by social media influencers and telehealth companies.

    At the meeting, Durbin promoted the Biden administration’s efforts on Medicare price negotiations, which he said aided more than 280,000 Illinoisans who take one or more of the 10 drugs affected by the policy.

    Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America CEO Steve Ubl said earlier this summer there are no assurances patients will see lower-out-of-pocket costs as the law that allowed for negotiations did “nothing to rein in abuses” by the insurers and PBMs that decide what medicines are covered and what patients pay.

    ###

  • 31 Oct 2024 9:06 AM | Deborah Hodges (Administrator)

    Sixty-five million older adults and people with disabilities have health insurance through the US Medicare program. However, high out-of-pocket costs, including premiums and cost sharing, make it difficult for many Medicare beneficiaries to afford care. One in 4 Medicare beneficiaries had an income of less than $21 000 per person in 2023 and 36% reported forgoing or delaying care due to cost concerns.1 Beneficiaries from racial and ethnic minority groups and those with multiple chronic conditions or disabilities frequently report cost barriers, raising concerns that high costs may keep essential care out of reach for vulnerable individuals.1 [JAMA Network]

    More> 

    ###

  • 30 Oct 2024 7:33 AM | Deborah Hodges (Administrator)

    Artificial intelligence tools could help solve workforce challenges. Implementation, however, can be difficult, pushing organizations to consider less risky administrative and back-office tasks first. 

    [Healthcare Dive]

    LAS VEGAS — When the University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System was testing an artificial intelligence-backed tool that drafts responses to messages, a patient misspelled the name of a medication, Karl Kochendorfer, chief health information officer, recalled during a panel at the HLTH conference last week.

    The mistake led the AI to give side effects for a drug the patient wasn’t using when a nurse forgot to double-check the response.

    Ultimately, it wasn’t a huge issue — they just needed to call the patient or send another message to issue a correction, he said. But it could have had serious implications for the tool.

    “It almost killed the pilot. [...] And it happened on day one,” he said.

    As healthcare grapples with how to safely implement AI, investors and health systems are first seeing promise adopting tools that automate administrative and back-office work, which could make a dent in provider burnout and pose fewer risks to patient care, experts said HLTH conference.

    But the pressure is on to adopt the tech. Proponents argue AI could help solve healthcare’s significant workforce challenges: The nation faces a shortage of more than 100,000 critical healthcare workers in 2028, as the overall population ages and needs more care, according to a report by consultancy Mercer.

    While AI could be transformative, the sector has to move with caution as it implements emerging tools, experts say. The stakes are high, as policymakers and experts have raised concerns about accuracy, bias and security. 

    More>


  • 29 Oct 2024 7:26 AM | Deborah Hodges (Administrator)

    Long COVID, also known as Post-COVID Conditions, was first reported anecdotally in April 2020 and has continued to cause significant suffering and disability in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.1 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines long COVID as "signs, symptoms, and conditions that continue or develop after acute COVID-19 infection" and notes that long COVID encompasses a wide range of symptoms that can last for weeks, months, or years.2 The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) estimates that 6.9 percent of adults have ever had long COVID as of early 2023 and finds differences by sex, age group, race and ethnicity, and preexisting chronic conditions.3 Similarly, the 2022 National Health Interview Survey estimates that 6.9 percent of adults in the United States ever had long COVID, with differences observed by sex, age group, race and ethnicity, poverty status, and urbanicity.4 An analysis of the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System estimates that 6.4 percent of adults in the United States ever had long COVID and finds variation by state.5 [Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality]


    Highlights

    Among adults who reported ever having COVID-19:
    • 13.7 percent reported ever having long COVID.
    • Women were more likely than men to report ever having long COVID (16.5% vs. 10.5%).
    • Adults aged 18-34 were less likely than all other age groups to report ever having long COVID (9.8% vs. 13.5%-17.9%).
    • Adults living in high-income households were less likely to report ever having long COVID (11.0%) than those living in middle-income households (15.6%), low-income or near poor households (17.4%), and those living in poor households (17.2%).
    • Adults living in a metropolitan statistical area reported lower rates of ever having long COVID than those living outside of a metropolitan statistical area (12.7% vs. 19.7%).

    More> 

    ###

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software